Ruth

@rae

Oh. Well. This is going to be….interesting.

@freedomwriter76

OH GIRLLLL!!! I am sooo doing this!!!

(@rae I think we both had the same idea…haha!)

1. Riker

2. Hans

3. Reuben

4. Fin

5. Aadelheide (not sure if I spelled that right…haha!)

@rae

Nahim is my fav charrie. He’s a warrior in a nation called the Realn (pronounced Ree-eln).

Ooh, cool! He sounds super interesting!

Have you ever interviewed veterans? It’s nerve-racking, but I learned a lot!

I haven’t, but that would be very cool!

Okay, I’ve never even touched a Great Dane actually.

Honestly I never thought I would either.…[Read more]

@rae

Oh goodness. A genre I don’t write in? Haha this might be interesting. We’ll see if I can come up with something.

@rae

I want to get back into a good RPing rhythm as well. I’ve really not been in a good RPing mood lately, idk why :/

@rae @jonas @beth-torres

I’m still here… I’m just not great with fighting scenes, but Kari is currently with Carrie and Silas.

@rae

Yeah, we’ve been trying. I’m not sure how we can do that, but I want to if we can.

@freedomwriter76 (thanks for the idea! 😝) @lightoverdarkness6 @smiley @mineralizedwritings @savannah_grace2009 @rae @grcr @whalekeeper @keilah-h @hybridlore

Okayyy! I’m copying Freedom, so you basically get to pick who you want to spend a day with. These are from different WIPs and I still don’t have as much as Freedom. (Does anyone really? &#x…[Read more]

@rae

What do you mean?

@rae

Okay, my hands are starting to sweat, which happens when I get excited.

😁

In context, your verse actually means that Paul can bear, can do anything God wants him to do if God wills it and strengthens him.

Yeah, makes sense to me!

The Doctrine of Hermeneutics. The latter part of that verse (John 1:3) says simply that what this passage means by…

[Read more]

@rae

Alright. Well, I think I just did that with the verses I showed, unless there’s still a fallacy somewhere.

@rae

While I’m laying my beliefs on the table, I’m also a Creationist, I believe strongly in the doctrine of hermeneutics, I believe in context, and I often take a literal viewpoint of the Bible’s text unless it is clearly poetic.

I just realized I missed this. I’m not familiar of the doctrine of hermeneutics, do you just mean Sola Sciptura? When…[Read more]

@rae

I didn’t think you were. I’m used to that, my grandfather and my…technically step-grandmother are not Calvinists either. In fact, Grandpa openly opposes Calvinism to the point of saying that John Calvin was a heretic. It has caused some…divisions to say the least.

I’m sorry to hear that:( Differences in those sorts of things will create…[Read more]

@rae

Mars hill was the place of philosephers.

Ok, cool!

Though, if there was nothing to teach us about one and two, then we wouldn’t know about it. Also, math would not exist if God didn’t. Someone has to create it right? math is not outside of God, He could break math when He wanted to, but He is so orderly, and never changes that I don’t think…

[Read more]

@rae

Put that way…XD Anselm would probably never win a debate on Mars hill!

Lol, yeah, I don’t know much about Mars hill, but yes, his rhetoric seems to ultimately fall flat.

I’ve heard variations of this idea. Essentially the idea that mathematics is essentially assumed to be not self sufficient, because mathematics is something that only s…[Read more]

@rae

Great point. That’s one argument many have made to Aquinas’ cosmological arguments, saying it’s too disconnected from the God of Abraham.  In this case though, I would go further. One of Anselm’s students found this argument to be completely invalid. He said to imagine the most perfect island. This island is so great to live on that nothing…[Read more]

@rae

Sorry my response is so late! But I was finally able to get to this.

M’kay. So overall, I was a little confused at what was going on, maybe because some oddly worded sentences, or maybe I was reading it too fast. XD That’s the initial thing I noticed.

I’m not sure what other feedback to give. You said some parts were giving you troub…[Read more]

@rae

Fair enough. Do you see anything wrong with the argument, or do you think it may actually show undeniably that God must exist?

@rae

Ontology is a philosophical study on what it means for something to exist. An ontological argument is essentially any argument that God must necessarily exist using logical language. The cosmological argument is a different kind of argument, saying essentially that there must be a self sufficient element that created the universe, and we say…[Read more]