katie

@Hope nope, why should I elaborate? It wasn’t my idea. *cheeky grin* XD

*coughs* Writing in the Light, for those of the curious, is a very difficult thing to put a unique logo to. Aside from light rays and candles and lanterns and other such highly cool, highly overused symbols. Therein, apparently, lies its difficulty and unsuitableness.

Kate out.

Nuts…it didn’t work. Okay, wait just a sec…

@hope So, the majority of the people like Writing in the Light, but that is a little long. What if you could make a logo of it and put that on the side of your book, like the picture I attached? Kinda like what Tolkien did.

@Mark-Kamibaya yes. Most people do use it as a classification system, which bothers me to no end. If you dig down deep and really get to understand the process though, you’ll see the sixteen types are really only a general summary of probabilities built on the common tendencies/stereotypes of the different functions. (Not cognitive functions;…[Read more]

@Jess-Penrose *bows back* *takes opinion*
You’re preaching to the choir here. I’m constantly telling my siblings that sort of thing when they jump to conclusions about ‘all one thing’ in types. Drives me slightly nuts sometimes, therefore I apologize for driving you nuts. XD Yep, I totally agree. I was thinking this mightn’t just be that though…[Read more]

@Jess-Penrose *fingerguns back* It’s great. 😀

And I have no idea what that one is so everybody else, fire away. 😛

@daeus On second thought, I’m going to go play rummy…

@daeus *wails* I’m all alone!!!

@dragon-snapper Yep. 😀

@dagon-snapper Yep. 😀

@hope I like Writing In The Light a lot. The first thing that came to my mind when I saw you were looking for another name though was “LightWrighter publishing”

Just a brainstorm idea.

@dragon-snapper I’m editing. I estimate I’ll be on for another twenty minutes.

@daeus @northerner @graciegirl @winter-rose @jess @not sure who else I’m writing.

@emily-d XD! Wonder why that is?

*blinks* Am I the only writer who doesn’t think that much about psychology and philosophy and theory and stuff like that?

@mark-kamibaya Looks like I didn’t phrase myself very well. I didn’t mean to say that psychology is a pseudoscience. What I meant was that I think it tends to include a lot more pseudoscience than a lot of other scientific arenas (i.e. meteorology). I think this is because, for the materialist, it is the closest to a religion they can get. So what…[Read more]

@Daeus thank you for asking that ’cause I’m pretty confused about it myself. 😛 First off, what’s your take on the meaning of Turbulent and Assertive? Because for the longest time @Kate-Flournoy and I thought it meant you were more or less that type; if it came out ENFJ-A then you were almost completely ENFJ, but if ENFJ-T you were less ENFJ than…[Read more]

HA!
Believe it. 😛

@Daeus

@emma-flournoy Hmm. So which is the dominate type, do you think? Have you ever typed yourself by your cognitive functions?