Kate Flournoy

@That_Writer_Girl_99 yes! That would be cool! If you do, tag me. ;P

@That_Writer_Girl_99 can’t speak for them, but when I do stuff like this I use Photoshop.

*sits quietly in the background and learns cool stuff*

@That_Writer_Girl_99 *is inspired*

True. All of it. *sighs* I suppose I’m not ready to be a teacher yet, then. 😉

NOW I’VE GOTTA GO WRITE. EXCUSE ME.

Tell you guys what. @Daeus @That_Writer_Girl_99 @Emma-Flournoy LET ME READ THE BOOK I’M GETTING. And then I will do a post on here and explain everything I understand. I know a tiny bit about cognitive functions but nowhere near enough to explain coherently.
See, this is the problem with being a teacher of something you’re fascinated by……[Read more]

@Daeus *freaks out* NO! I’M NOT READY! I HAVE TO GET IT STRAIGHT IN MY HEAD FIRST! 😛

@Dragon-Snapper uhhhh… calligraphy is a good place. 😛 Any art, really, though as calligraphy focuses more on words and their composition it’s excellent for setting a groundwork.

@That_Writer_Girl_99 yep! Though if you could share the link again… my computer crashed and I lost it. 🙁

Welcome back @Corissa-Maiden-of-Praise! The world can always use more ENFJs. 😉

(Pretty wicked design skills there, by the way, Snapper. Do you have any experience with graphic design?)

@Dragon-Snapper yes, I love that! It’s called a monogram. We haven’t discussed that, have we @Hope? Or at least the one you came up with didn’t… er… work. 😛

@Hope nope, why should I elaborate? It wasn’t my idea. *cheeky grin* XD

*coughs* Writing in the Light, for those of the curious, is a very difficult thing to put a unique logo to. Aside from light rays and candles and lanterns and other such highly cool, highly overused symbols. Therein, apparently, lies its difficulty and unsuitableness.

Kate out.

@Mark-Kamibaya yes. Most people do use it as a classification system, which bothers me to no end. If you dig down deep and really get to understand the process though, you’ll see the sixteen types are really only a general summary of probabilities built on the common tendencies/stereotypes of the different functions. (Not cognitive functions;…[Read more]

HA!
Believe it. 😛

@Daeus

@Jane-Maree welp, I’m the little sopping bucket of tears, so… XD

@Daeus riiiiiight. *rolls eyes*
Good job sir. *high fives* You’ve no excuse coming to me now with questions. XD
Just kidding.
Kates likes to be asked questions almost as much as Daeuses likes to steal.

@Jane-Maree good for you. 😀 ENFPs are fun.

@BethanySinkyRoses also just like to point out; this—

However, I have read MBTI blogs which treat the analysis like another “gospel.” (If you strengthen your weaker functions, you’ll be perfect or saved from your faults or sins.)

is what happens when man tries to explain human nature without factoring God in. Ultimately everything you study…[Read more]

@BethanySinkyRoses also just like to point out; this—

However, I have read MBTI blogs which treat the analysis like another “gospel.” (If you strengthen your weaker functions, you’ll be perfect or saved from your faults or sins.) T

is what happens when man tries to explain human nature without factoring God in. Ultimately everything you study…[Read more]

@Bethany-Sinky-Roses also just like to point out; this—

However, I have read MBTI blogs which treat the analysis like another “gospel.” (If you strengthen your weaker functions, you’ll be perfect or saved from your faults or sins.) T

is what happens when man tries to explain human nature without factoring God in. Ultimately everything you s…[Read more]

@Mark-Kamibaya woohoo! You are brave! 😛

Well, pretty much everything’s been said… how deeply have you studied MBTI? Do you view it as a classification system or pieces to a bigger puzzle? Because a classification system it definitely is not.

@Jane-Maree INFP?

@BethanySinkyRoses hmmm… with you I’m not so sure. Sometimes you can tell just…[Read more]