Daeus

@kate-flournoy I was going through some notes I had made for myself on stuff to edit and knocking through them. Not sure exactly how many I did. Maybe fifteen.

@jess Ok. I’ll probably be asleep by then, but happy writing.

mmm, I feel marvelously ellowed today.

@jess Is that your ten or my ten?

Ellow peoples. Just wanted to see if anyone was writing tonight. @kate-flournoy @bluejay @overcomer @gretald @etc @etc

@winter-rose Wait, you only read the first book? Yeah, there is a second book. It’s called the fiddler’s green. You can’t read the first one without that one too. Of course, I can’t tell you what happened, but it has a good ending.

@graciekry Sweet stuff. Blogging sounds fun, though I’ve never really done it.

What’s your story about?

Oh! I forgot to tell you. Welcome to the bestistest place on the internet.

@overcomer @clairec Personally, I would keep the beginning. I get how it could confuse one about what type of story it is about. I don’t remember that happening to me, but I could see it happening. Maybe there would be another way around that. Probably, even just a slight change of style would do it.

What I liked about it though was that it gave…[Read more]

@warrioroftherealm Well, I’m sure there’s a simple solution out there. The rationalized foolishness of people is simply astounding. People can convince themselves that anything they do is consistent. I really can’t offer an answer, but here are some ideas:

.The pirate hunter has a personal motive and plan for using the boy when he is…[Read more]

Ok @kate-flournoy. I don’t grudge you making apple pie.

@kate-flournoy Are you writing anymore today?

@kate-flournoy Hehehe (That was Harold)

@kate-flournoy Got three chapters edited on yet another pass through TATHOF.

What were you working on?

@kate-flournoy Should be good.

@kate-flournoy Well, if you’re still writing, I’m all go.

hmm… I like that theory. Not everything is better broken, but a lot of things are.

And then maybe too it’s a parable about how we see a use in something when a greater use is intended for it that we could have never seen.

I don’t mean of course that ambiguity is synonymous with depth in the way modern poets take that axiom, but I mean in the sense of making imagery universal and subtle.

…if that makes any sense.

I was thinking a straight forward poem would be meaningless and that ambiguity is often synonymous with depth. I think I can support your interpretation though. It sounds like a good one.