- This topic has 263 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 9 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Is this one of the most ultra-fascinating topics I have yet discovered? Are you a genius?
What letter does the sound ‘B’ make?
He must increase, but I must decrease.
Is it? Am I?
Because that’s a form of inversion, and because letters are really just symbols holding arbitrary information, could it perhaps make every letter?
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
*reads entire discussion up to this point*
Why have I not seen this sooner?
How awesome is this?
How long can an average human play a game of ‘only speak in questions’ without succumbing to the insurmountable urge to make a statement?
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Who put the bop in the bop shoo bop shoo bop?
(I love that song!)
What do you call a group of geckoos???
Have you ever heard of An Exaltation of Larks (by James Lipton) or The Book of St. Albans (author disputed)? (Both books on on that general topic, but regrettably I was unable to find a conclusive answer to your question)
Why can you be up for something, and down for something and both mean your want to do that something? Is a generalization you could make that you can be some external vector for something? But when you say ‘I’m out’, isn’t that saying that you don’t want to do that something, even though it would be an external vector? And why can you also say ‘I’m in’ being an internal vector, meaning that you want to do that something? What does up, down, in share in common, that out doesn’t?
(What a fascinating question…😐😔🥺😢😭😩😑🤭😆😆🤣🤣🤣)
Is it?
Indeed, it is, but did I discover it, or did it already exist?
Am I?
Is it true that everyone is a genius at five years old and as they grow older they start using a different part of their brain? Therefore, would we all be genius, if we could only find the right way to think?
Because that’s a form of inversion, and because letters are really just symbols holding arbitrary information, could it perhaps make every letter?
Perhaps it could make any letter one wanted, but in the English alphabet, perhaps it makes the letter “B”?
Does anyone else do Geometry just for the satisfaction and firm logic of it?
He must increase, but I must decrease.
What does up, down, in share in common, that out doesn’t?
Do these three positions have something spiritual in common?
Is ‘up’ an affirmative because God is up, and therefore good is up?
Is ‘down’ an affirmative and a negative depending on the question because hell is down, but God came down to earth as well? Therefore evil is down, but good came down too? So it can be used in both a positive and negative sense?
Is ‘in’ an affirmative because it evokes a feeling of community and companionship? Can ‘in’-ness be a negative thing? If you are in something, must you be out of something else?
Is ‘out’ strictly negative? Is it negative perhaps because of one of the first outs that happened? (Satan being cast out of heaven). Or perhaps it is negative because of baseball, three strikes and you’re out?
Is any of my logic logical? Or is it illogical logic? Can logic ever be illogical?
He must increase, but I must decrease.
Is it possible to believe that I only found this topic recently, (thanks to my sis @felicity ), have sped read through the posts on my thirty minute lunch break and am now thoroughly intrigued and inspired to finish the rest of my ten hour shift as a barista?
Elen síla lúmenn' omentielvo
Why is cargo on a ship, and shipment on a plane?
Follow your heart, but take your brain with you.
Why have I not seen this sooner?
Have you not seen this sooner because you have a life beyond just the questions, or are the questions your life?
How awesome is this?
Is it as awesome as a possum, or maybe chocolate frosten?
How long can an average human play a game of ‘only speak in questions’ without succumbing to the insurmountable urge to make a statement?
You want to find out?
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Would a woodchuck chuck as much wood as a would chuck would chuck wood?
(What a fascinating question…😐😔🥺😢😭😩😑🤭😆😆🤣🤣🤣)
(Thanks!) Has my string of emojis stuck with you this whole time? Has it been causing you to question?
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
Is the question as to whether you discovered these questions or they already existed an allegory to the question of whether mathematics, logic, or even reality itself is invented or discovered?
Is genius found, or made? Is it in the creative student, or the wise elder? Is it both?
If we are looking at uniquely the English alphabet, could we trust that the sound ‘B’ would always make the letter “B”? Because the letter “B” doesn’t always make the sound ‘B’, will the sound ‘B’ not always make the letter “B”?
(I love geometry!) Do you just study Euclidean geometry? What about higher dimensional geometry? Spherical geometry? Maybe Hyperbolic geometry? Or any other topological spaces?
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
If there is spiritual meaning to those, is that meaning purely pointed out for our fancy, or could its etymology be traced to those meanings?
If it is true that it is a spiritual sense, then would up for something be saying that you intend to grow because of the activity? Then would down for something also be affirmative because your saying that you also want to let the activity to bring you down through hardship, so you can ultimately grow even greater?
Should we also consider the fact that when we say ‘in’, we say we’re in ON something? Whereas out doesn’t work the same, nor does up or down, is that negligible?
If a logical system cannot prove everything within itself through its own logic, then will we never be able to fully trust that logic can be logical? Does restricted logic that doesn’t have fully access to a full system conclude false statements within that system, therefore creating illogical logic?
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
Is it possible? Do questions inspire baristas because they are something to think about whilst barista-ing?
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
Aren’t those both used entirely interchangeably?
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
Yes, but they are most often referred to separately, at least in what I hear from day to day. By definition, they are almost entirely the same, but in speech they are often used differently.
Follow your heart, but take your brain with you.
(Ah! I forgot the question rule! There are definitely invisible parentheses around that last message lol)
Follow your heart, but take your brain with you.
(Ah! I forgot the question rule! There are definitely invisible parentheses around that last message lol)
*Hard beamy squint*
Should I trust you? What should we do to properly shame someone when they failed to ask a question? Do we given them sudden interrogation questions?
Maybe something like, ‘Do you work for the statemency? What are they giving you? Are they bribing you with answers? Do you believe that we really would let you spread statement ideologies on this forum?’
*Doesn’t even deserve to be quoted*
Do you think that it may vary from location? Does cargo literally mean car-go originally intended for wheeled vehicles?
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.