- This topic has 263 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 7 months, 4 weeks ago by
.
-
Posts
-
@sarafini
If a dream is reality, what about a dream within a dream? Is it a even more real reality?
Is it 60 because 60 is a highly composite number? Why is 60 highly composite?
Is language just a collection of meaningless sounds given meaning by artificial construct? Or is language another word for how one can transfer information of infinite complexity by designated informational unites?
Is the word word’s etymology tracible to babel? Why is it that in the Bible, the Savior was sometimes referred to as the ‘Word’.
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
Would by definition, the unknowable, ineffable, and incomprehensible mean that we could not accomplish such a feat, or could we at least make models and representations of such things through the words we use for them, such as ineffable, though by definition, the ineffable cannot be described by words?
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
(Yep, I am! Just let me know a time. Now or later works.)
Follow your heart, but take your brain with you.
(Sweet! Now works if your willing.)
Do you have any preference for speed games, or just standard? Should I send a link?
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
(We can just do standard, if that’s okay with you. Go ahead and send the link. I doubt I could do it with my lack of tech skills lol)
Follow your heart, but take your brain with you.
(See if that works)
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
(GG!)
(Thanks for playing! I actually gotta go, it was fun though! Hopefully we can play again soon!)
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
(Alright, bye! I’ll look forward to it 🙂)
Follow your heart, but take your brain with you.
Would by definition, the unknowable, ineffable, and incomprehensible mean that we could not accomplish such a feat, or could we at least make models and representations of such things through the words we use for them, such as ineffable, though by definition, the ineffable cannot be described by words?
(Oof) (Erm…)
(Making models may be possible, but it depends on if the unknown is able to be touched. Unless it is possible to create a physical model of something that is not physical…)
Write what should not be forgotten. — Isabel Allende
Would it work in a similar fashion to models of higher dimensional objects, such as 3d shadows?
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
(Possibly) (Now, if we are speaking of the unknown as the future, things that are yet to happen, then there is no way that we can make a model that accurately represents it. All we know is the known future. There is an extent and a limit to what we can know. This shows how finite we are, and how omniscient and infinite our God is. He knows everything, and we don’t. There is a limit to our knowledge, no matter how hard we try we won’t be able to know everything. So in the end, only to a certain extent can we make a model of the unknown future. This said model would be based solely on calculations, conjecturing, and how much we can know of the future.)
Write what should not be forgotten. — Isabel Allende
(True, and we can make accurate predictions on something like the future, but the further you go, the more unsure it is those predictions can be. Yes, in fact there is a mathematical boundary for what we can understand axiomatically. Thus it is only through having a perfect knowledge of all things can one actually pass that boundary, because having a perfect knowledge is beyond axiomatic mathematics.)
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
Why do we bake cookies and cook bacon?
Why do we drive on a parkway and park on a driveway?
Why did Tarzan never have a beard? (This one bothers me for some reason lol)
Follow your heart, but take your brain with you.
Why can you be up for something, and down for something and both mean your want to do that something? Is a generalization you could make that you can be some external vector for something? But when you say ‘I’m out’, isn’t that saying that you don’t want to do that something, even though it would be an external vector? And why can you also say ‘I’m in’ being an internal vector, meaning that you want to do that something? What does up, down, in share in common, that out doesn’t?
He is perfect in Justice, yet He is perfect in Mercy, even when we fail Him. For this, He is good.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.