- This topic has 31 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 5 months, 1 week ago by
.
-
Posts
-
probably, I think it was G-rated, maybe PG
I'm here but not here--I'm ghosting you all
Never heard of these books before.
š¶ I'm still dancing to the music in the garden that was so much brighter then...š¶
@whalekeeperĀ Ā Ā @calyhuge
I was interesting in Tale of Despareaux for the world building involving the government. I love tyrannical Government books, and my next story might have characters getting thrown into a pit if they don’t follow the rules. (just kidding…… maybe) but beyond that I didn’t really love the story. It was interesting though. That’s all I’ve read/watched of her stuff.
Fires will rise to testify that 2+2=4. Swords will be drawn to prove that leaves are green in summer
Oh they are very good! You like stories with animal protagonists, right? (I think.) Despareaux is right up that story lane.
I was interesting in Tale of Despareaux for the world building involving the government. I love tyrannical Government books, and my next story might have characters getting thrown into a pit if they donāt follow the rules. (just kiddingā¦ā¦ maybe)
*Snorts* š¤£š¤£
but beyond that I didnāt really love the story. It was interesting though. Thatās all Iāve read/watched of her stuff.
That’s okay. Some people like soup-loving searats, others don’t. Are you not as much of a fantasy reader? I ask that because most people on here are, and although I know you like LotR, I’m just curious.
I will make you lose The Game with me.
@ellette-giselle @whalekeeper Uncharacteristically for me, I liked the movie better than the book
That and Mary Poppins are the only movies I liked better than the book
I'm here but not here--I'm ghosting you all
I think I can say I have more fondness for the movie, even if the book is the correct source of reference in my mind. Mary Poppins is kind of the same, too.
I will make you lose The Game with me.
That’s me with War Horse. The book was told from the horse’s perspective and was very confusing and somewhat uninteresting because the horse sometimes had horse limitation and sometimes could think like a person. But the movie was amazing because you can see everything the horse is seeing.
I do like some fantasy. But not a lot. Partly because a lot of it is dirty and part because a lot of it has strange creatures. That leaves me with a slim amount of fantasy. XD
Fires will rise to testify that 2+2=4. Swords will be drawn to prove that leaves are green in summer
Oh, youāre not interested in strange creatures? Not even an Oiple?
At least a lot of middle grade fantasy isnāt dirty, and you can find a lot of fairy-tale-like stories. I think Iām always curious to find those stories for a younger audience which are for adults too, because they end up being the most subtle. What kind of stuff did you read when you were younger?
I will make you lose The Game with me.
Yes, I do like stories with animal protagonists.
š¶ I'm still dancing to the music in the garden that was so much brighter then...š¶
My siblings and I listened to an audiobook of The Tale of Despereaux several years ago. Never watched the movie though. I liked itāalthough it has been fuel for my dislike of the word soup. I loved the rats. š¤ We were going to make our dolls (or Legos, I canāt remember) act it out onceā¦ that was fun to imagine though we never followed through, lol.
The only other Kate DiCamillo book I know for sure Iāve read is Because of Winn-Dixie.
*sadly eats another scoop of ice cream*
I read Narnia, but other then that I read mostly fiction set in our world or a fantasy world that was basically earth alternate reality with no weird creatures just a bunch of artistic liberty.
The only other Kate DiCamillo book I know for sure Iāve read is Because of Winn-Dixie.
Oh wait, I read that one. I didn’t like it. I don’t remember why, I just remember not liking it so much that I got rid of it. I feel like it didn’t have much of a storyline.
Fires will rise to testify that 2+2=4. Swords will be drawn to prove that leaves are green in summer
Yeah, I wasnāt fond of it. I donāt remember why I donāt like it either, I just donāt.
*sadly eats another scoop of ice cream*
I liked itāalthough it has been fuel for my dislike of the word soup.
What?? You donāt like the word soup??Ā I love love love the word soup, you must be absolutely out of your mind, girl. š You like the food though, right?
I read Narnia, but other then that I read mostly fiction set in our world or a fantasy world that was basically earth alternate reality with no weird creatures just a bunch of artistic liberty.
*Thinks up other examples of artistic liberty in fantasy* Powers? Medieval quests? What kind of fantastical elements are you more interested in?
Oh wait, I read that one. I didnāt like it. I donāt remember why, I just remember not liking it so much that I got rid of it. I feel like it didnāt have much of a storyline.
I really liked it for its themes. If I read Winn-Dixie and didnāt pick up on them, I would probably feel the same way, because otherwise it does feel like a bunch of random events. But the contrast between Opal and the preacher is the real center theme, showing why a willingness to connect is so important, and the rest of the book pieces together from there. Thatās why I like it.
I will make you lose The Game with me.
Lolololol š maybe I am out of my mind
I love soup in real lifeāawh, chicken noodle is one of my all-time favorite things to eatābut the word is justā¦. Sooooup? Ew. lol I just canāt with how it sounds.
*sadly eats another scoop of ice cream*
I was just about to make this topic! I love Kate DiCamillo so much! I just reread The Tale of Despereaux. It’s sooo good! And Mercy Watson! I love Mercy Watson!!!!
MARCIE! YOU MADE EGG SOUP!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.