NatalieMarie

@Dragon-Snapper yes, I love that! It’s called a monogram. We haven’t discussed that, have we @Hope? Or at least the one you came up with didn’t… er… work. 😛

@Mark-Kamibaya That’s what you get when you make clickbait. XD It’s an interesting discussion at any rate.

@BethanysInkyRoses REALLY? That makes a lot more sense now. I always thought it was Bethany Sinky Roses and could never figure out why. Thank you for the enlightenment! *chuckle* Sorry ’bout that. No apostrophe in a username… Aaaand are…[Read more]

@Hope nope, why should I elaborate? It wasn’t my idea. *cheeky grin* XD

*coughs* Writing in the Light, for those of the curious, is a very difficult thing to put a unique logo to. Aside from light rays and candles and lanterns and other such highly cool, highly overused symbols. Therein, apparently, lies its difficulty and unsuitableness.

Kate out.

@Mark-Kamibaya yes. Most people do use it as a classification system, which bothers me to no end. If you dig down deep and really get to understand the process though, you’ll see the sixteen types are really only a general summary of probabilities built on the common tendencies/stereotypes of the different functions. (Not cognitive functions;…[Read more]

@Jess-Penrose *bows back* *takes opinion*
You’re preaching to the choir here. I’m constantly telling my siblings that sort of thing when they jump to conclusions about ‘all one thing’ in types. Drives me slightly nuts sometimes, therefore I apologize for driving you nuts. XD Yep, I totally agree. I was thinking this mightn’t just be that though…[Read more]

@Jess-Penrose *fingerguns back* It’s great. 😀

And I have no idea what that one is so everybody else, fire away. 😛

@dragon-snapper Yep. 😀

@dagon-snapper Yep. 😀

@dragon-snapper I’m editing. I estimate I’ll be on for another twenty minutes.

@mark-kamibaya Looks like I didn’t phrase myself very well. I didn’t mean to say that psychology is a pseudoscience. What I meant was that I think it tends to include a lot more pseudoscience than a lot of other scientific arenas (i.e. meteorology). I think this is because, for the materialist, it is the closest to a religion they can get. So what…[Read more]

@Daeus thank you for asking that ’cause I’m pretty confused about it myself. 😛 First off, what’s your take on the meaning of Turbulent and Assertive? Because for the longest time @Kate-Flournoy and I thought it meant you were more or less that type; if it came out ENFJ-A then you were almost completely ENFJ, but if ENFJ-T you were less ENFJ than…[Read more]

HA!
Believe it. 😛

@Daeus

@emma-flournoy Hmm. So which is the dominate type, do you think? Have you ever typed yourself by your cognitive functions?

@Jane-Maree welp, I’m the little sopping bucket of tears, so… XD

@Northerner Oh yeah I know, XNFJs can sure tell things. (I know. I am one partway.) But I was being sorta sarcastic there. 😛
And the INTP INFJ combo is interesting btw…don’t think I’ve seen that anywhere before. It seems like they would work…mebbe kinda like INTJ and INFP, which is s’posed to be an extremely good pairing. Or with ENFP and…[Read more]

@Hope Yah yah. XD Though I think Writing in the Light also sounds more official. So…so there.

@Daeus riiiiiight. *rolls eyes*
Good job sir. *high fives* You’ve no excuse coming to me now with questions. XD
Just kidding.
Kates likes to be asked questions almost as much as Daeuses likes to steal.

@Jane-Maree good for you. 😀 ENFPs are fun.

@Hope Writing in the Light Publishing is still my favorite. But Inkfeather Publications is cool… I think WitL goes better with your… mission? though. I mean, it obviously does. But I really like it.

@Daeus I knew you meant that kind of turbulent. XD Yes, very. 80%. I wonder how you guessed.

@Devastate-Lasting Charles Dickens, excellent choice. *high-five*