Mark Kamibaya

@kate-flournoy Thanks! I don’t have any experience in graphic design though…how would I start?n
@emma-flournoy Also thanks. 😀
@hope Thanks! I figured it probably be a less ‘scribbly’ version… 😛

@BethanysInkyRoses ENTP?

@kate-flournoy I can’t even remember what I came up with… I think it was for my name, not for my site. And no, it didn’t work. XD

But monograms are pretty cool. I love that, @dragon-snapper. 🙂

@dragon-snapper @ethryndal @northerner @graciegirl @winter-rose @jess Anyone else on? I’m going till 2.

@bethanysinkyroses ESTP?

That’s pretty cool @Dragon-Snapper.

(Pretty wicked design skills there, by the way, Snapper. Do you have any experience with graphic design?)

@mark-kamibaya WHAT!?!? The earth revolves around the sun???????

Here, have some fun with this. (one piece of language, fyi)

@Dragon-Snapper yes, I love that! It’s called a monogram. We haven’t discussed that, have we @Hope? Or at least the one you came up with didn’t… er… work. 😛

@Mark-Kamibaya That’s what you get when you make clickbait. XD It’s an interesting discussion at any rate.

@BethanysInkyRoses REALLY? That makes a lot more sense now. I always thought it was Bethany Sinky Roses and could never figure out why. Thank you for the enlightenment! *chuckle* Sorry ’bout that. No apostrophe in a username… Aaaand are…[Read more]

Okay. This…

This is just a quick sketch.

@Hope nope, why should I elaborate? It wasn’t my idea. *cheeky grin* XD

*coughs* Writing in the Light, for those of the curious, is a very difficult thing to put a unique logo to. Aside from light rays and candles and lanterns and other such highly cool, highly overused symbols. Therein, apparently, lies its difficulty and unsuitableness.

Kate out.

Nuts…it didn’t work. Okay, wait just a sec…

@hope So, the majority of the people like Writing in the Light, but that is a little long. What if you could make a logo of it and put that on the side of your book, like the picture I attached? Kinda like what Tolkien did.

@Mark-Kamibaya yes. Most people do use it as a classification system, which bothers me to no end. If you dig down deep and really get to understand the process though, you’ll see the sixteen types are really only a general summary of probabilities built on the common tendencies/stereotypes of the different functions. (Not cognitive functions;…[Read more]

@Jess-Penrose *bows back* *takes opinion*
You’re preaching to the choir here. I’m constantly telling my siblings that sort of thing when they jump to conclusions about ‘all one thing’ in types. Drives me slightly nuts sometimes, therefore I apologize for driving you nuts. XD Yep, I totally agree. I was thinking this mightn’t just be that though…[Read more]

@Jess-Penrose *fingerguns back* It’s great. 😀

And I have no idea what that one is so everybody else, fire away. 😛

@kina-lamb LightWrighter sounds cool too. The main problem being that Lightwriter is a thing and that might get confusing. 🙁

@daeus On second thought, I’m going to go play rummy…

@daeus *wails* I’m all alone!!!