Sarah Spradlin

It really depends, @I-J-Anderson. Some books are good with illustrations. A lot of old classics have illustrations— things like Gene Stratton-Porter, and Ballantyne, and the like. I liked those because they sort of filled in the setting gaps the author didn’t spend much time on, though I could have filled it in without them. I guess what I’m…[Read more]

@Daeus of course. No one doubts that. XD

@Daeus Oh gracious, that was dumb. *headdesk*

@I-J-Anderson There!

I’m sorry…dunno what’s goin’ on. 😛

i-j-anderson

That’s the right tag but it didn’t work…lemme try again.

I-J-Anderson

I-J-Anderson Well if the book was written well, there won’t be a long, clunky, awkward description. 😛

I prefer to get my picture of the character from reading the book, not by an actual picture. It just seems more real to me that way. I could like looking at pictures of characters after I already have my own head picture, but not to get my perception.

I tend to agree with @Daeus, @His-Instrument. Literature doesn’t always HAVE to be literal and exact to the real world— especially when it comes to symbolism, there are definite lines you can cross— but unless you feel that it will help illustrate a truth (maybe you wanna explore guilt and how it keeps you from moving on?) probably best not to…[Read more]

@Ethryndal Definitely. I sure hope she’s able to do it.

I know I put a link up above, but here’s the same video insert in my post. Enjoy!

Ha it worked. Will you look at that. Thanks @daeus

Yikes!! How’d you do that???

You too @Dragon-Snapper. 😀

Hey all. I found an interesting stop motion about Christmas. Consider it a present to y’all. 😉