Activity

Yeah it was definitely a flawed movie

@smiley @freedomwriter76
I already miss Tony… After Endgame, I went and watched Iron Man 3, and it…was good. My big brother and I watched Ant-man 1, now Scott is on my fav list.
Man, my fav list is getting long…is it okay that I like post the Click Thanos?
I watched the first Spiderman and started the second, but I need to take a break! Man, I really just all a sudden got really into Marvel (I’m even considering a fanfic).
I saw a pic of Vision and started crying…
And the scene where Buck falls from the train in Captain America: The First Avenger consistently makes me cry…it doesn’t help that Steve cries too…we cry together…<3
And then when in Civil War, Bucky says that Steve used to put newspaper in his shoes, and Falcon says that that's something you don't read in a museum. Lol.

Oops, sorry, I'm ranting, aren't I?

And how the Asgardians call Rocket “rabbit”. It’s so great!

@rae Now that you’ve seen Endgame, would you, or anyone else care to discuss this opinion of mine: Endgame was good but was not a worthy follow-up to Infinity War. I’ll let someone else reply before I tell you why I think this is. Note that I still like Endgame, but it had some flaws that don’t pay off Infinity War in my opinion.

@jonas
I will say I like infinity war better, (even though Bucky dies 😭, and Peter! Vision too) maybe because it left me more on the edge of my seat than Endgame. Endgame has some good values that it portrays rather nicely, in my opinion. Old Steve makes me cry, but then the ending scene of him and Peggy 💗. I forgave him. Idk, I like infinity war better, but i can’t quite pin down exactly why, since both have marvelous (no pun intended) pieces.

@rae
In my opinion they shouldn’t have gone to time travel for Endgame. Time travel breaks universes and creates plot holes. For example, the Avengers could have just time travelled back to steal pym particles right away, and then had plenty of fuel to go steal each stone individually at an easier point in time. I also don’t really like how they skipped five years at the beginning. It seems like they basically did it to give Morgan time to grow up and so that Scott Lang would realize that they could time travel. And because of it, they were able to turn Thor into a drunken fool without having to show how that happened. Bruce Banner’s entire conflict from the last movie is resolved off screen. I’ll also note one final thing that drives me crazy. How on earth does Thanos defeat Iron Man, Captain America, and Thor so easily without ANY infinity stones? In Infinity War, Stormbreaker was able to overpower the infinity gauntlet, and now Thor is just going to be completely beaten up while he has Stormbreaker AND Mjolnir? Iron Man also fared remarkably well against Thanos when Thanos had FOUR infinity stones, but he does super poorly, even with an upgraded suit, against Thanos with NO infinity stones! Power levels are so messed up.
I still like Endgame, and a lot of these are nitpicks, but those are all problems that make it less enjoyable. It’s not like it messed up everything Infinity War set up. Tony’s death was really good. (And I knew it would happen, even before Infinity War came out. It just HAD to happen.)

Reply button, come back!!!!

Yeah, I wasn’t a fan of the time travel, but hey, a lot of people are. And, to give them credit, they did visit it in a new and exciting way.

I actually like that they resolved Banner off screen. I think it was more like Banner for that to happen.

As far as the power level thing, I del like with many superheroes, writers forget how super they actually are. I’ve done it myself with Glace. He’s just so invincible that I couldn’t challenge him physically, so I had to cut him back. I think that’s what happened.

Whatever, fact remains for both of us, Endgame is still enjoyable if you don’t lie awake at night thinking about plot holes.